• Home
  • Search
  • Browse Collections
  • My Account
  • About
  • DC Network Digital Commons Network™
Skip to main content
Digital Commons @ Ursinus College Ursinus College
  • Home
  • About
  • FAQ
  • My Account
  1. Home
  2. >
  3. Community Projects
  4. >
  5. Welcome Home Project
  6. >
  7. Elder John Thomas Digital Archives
  8. >
  9. Graves Protection and Repatriation

Graves Protection and Repatriation

 
Printing is not supported at the primary Gallery Thumbnail page. Please first navigate to a specific Image before printing.

Follow

Switch View to Grid View Slideshow
 
  • Letter from Laurie to Congress by Laurie

    Letter from Laurie to Congress

    Laurie

    This handwritten letter, circa 1988, from a student to members of Congress, is regarding the Union County, Kentucky, grave desecration. This is one of dozens of similar letters sent to Congress as part of a campaign to influence tougher legislation on the looting of burial sites.

  • Letter from Margaret to Congress by Margaret

    Letter from Margaret to Congress

    Margaret

    This handwritten letter, circa 1988, from a student to members of Congress, is regarding the Union County, Kentucky, grave desecration. This is one of dozens of similar letters sent to Congress as part of a campaign to influence tougher legislation on the looting of burial sites.

  • Letter from Mary to Congress by Mary

    Letter from Mary to Congress

    Mary

    This handwritten letter, circa 1988, from a student to members of Congress, is regarding the Union County, Kentucky, grave desecration. This is one of dozens of similar letters sent to Congress as part of a campaign to influence tougher legislation on the looting of burial sites.

  • Letter from Michael to Congress by Michael

    Letter from Michael to Congress

    Michael

    This handwritten letter, circa 1988, from a student to members of Congress, is regarding the Union County, Kentucky, grave desecration. This is one of dozens of similar letters sent to Congress as part of a campaign to influence tougher legislation on the looting of burial sites.

  • Letter from Mike to Congress by Mike

    Letter from Mike to Congress

    Mike

    This handwritten letter, circa 1988, from a student to members of Congress, is regarding the Union County, Kentucky, grave desecration. This is one of dozens of similar letters sent to Congress as part of a campaign to influence tougher legislation on the looting of burial sites.

  • Letter from Milly to Congress by Milly

    Letter from Milly to Congress

    Milly

    This handwritten letter, circa 1988, from a student to members of Congress, is regarding the Union County, Kentucky, grave desecration. This is one of dozens of similar letters sent to Congress as part of a campaign to influence tougher legislation on the looting of burial sites.

  • Letter from Mixi to Congress by Mixi

    Letter from Mixi to Congress

    Mixi

    This handwritten letter, circa 1988, from a student to members of Congress, is regarding the Union County, Kentucky, grave desecration. This is one of dozens of similar letters sent to Congress as part of a campaign to influence tougher legislation on the looting of burial sites.

  • Letter from Nathen to Congress by Nathen

    Letter from Nathen to Congress

    Nathen

    This handwritten letter, circa 1988, from a student to members of Congress, is regarding the Union County, Kentucky, grave desecration. This is one of dozens of similar letters sent to Congress as part of a campaign to influence tougher legislation on the looting of burial sites.

  • Letter from Nick to Congress by Nick

    Letter from Nick to Congress

    Nick

    This handwritten letter, circa 1988, from a student to members of Congress, is regarding the Union County, Kentucky, grave desecration. This is one of dozens of similar letters sent to Congress as part of a campaign to influence tougher legislation on the looting of burial sites.

  • Letter from Rheanna to Congress by Rheanna

    Letter from Rheanna to Congress

    Rheanna

    This handwritten letter, circa 1988, from a student to members of Congress, is regarding the Union County, Kentucky, grave desecration. This is one of dozens of similar letters sent to Congress as part of a campaign to influence tougher legislation on the looting of burial sites.

  • Letter from Ryan to Congress by Ryan

    Letter from Ryan to Congress

    Ryan

    This handwritten letter, circa 1988, from a student to members of Congress, is regarding the Union County, Kentucky, grave desecration. This is one of dozens of similar letters sent to Congress as part of a campaign to influence tougher legislation on the looting of burial sites.

  • Shawnee Authorization Letter for John and William Thomas by Ron Sparkman

    Shawnee Authorization Letter for John and William Thomas

    Ron Sparkman

    This typed letter, circa 1988, provides authorization for John and William Thomas to work on behalf of the Shawnee Nation to reinter ancestral remains from disturbed burial grounds near Uniontown, Kentucky. The letter seeks assistance for the Thomases in their tasks and asks to help develop legislation to protect Indian burial sites in the future.

    A handwritten note appears at the bottom of the document.

  • Letter from Terri to Congress by Terri

    Letter from Terri to Congress

    Terri

    This handwritten letter, circa 1988, from a student to members of Congress, is regarding the Union County, Kentucky, grave desecration. This is one of dozens of similar letters sent to Congress as part of a campaign to influence tougher legislation on the looting of burial sites.

  • Form Letter from John Thomas Regarding Desecration of a Shawnee Burial Site at Uniontown, Kentucky by John Thomas

    Form Letter from John Thomas Regarding Desecration of a Shawnee Burial Site at Uniontown, Kentucky

    John Thomas

    This typed letter from John Thomas, circa March 1988, is an appeal for help raising funds to support reburial efforts in Uniontown, Kentucky. Thomas recounts his previous experience helping with reburials and legislative efforts to prevent further grave desecration from happening. John explains that a delegation of Shawnee medicine men and elders needs to be organized for an appropriate re-burial.

  • Letter from Torie to Congress by Torie

    Letter from Torie to Congress

    Torie

    This handwritten letter, circa 1988, from a student to members of Congress, is regarding the Union County, Kentucky, grave desecration. This is one of dozens of similar letters sent to Congress as part of a campaign to influence tougher legislation on the looting of burial sites.

  • Letter from Travis to Congress by Travis

    Letter from Travis to Congress

    Travis

    This handwritten letter, circa 1988, from a student to members of Congress, is regarding the Union County, Kentucky, grave desecration. This is one of dozens of similar letters sent to Congress as part of a campaign to influence tougher legislation on the looting of burial sites.

  • Decker Cave Action Plan, March 23, 1987 by Walter E. Allen

    Decker Cave Action Plan, March 23, 1987

    Walter E. Allen

    This 20-page typed document consists of an action plan sent to District Ranger John Tharp from archeologist Walter E. Allen on March 23, 1987 as well as supplementary materials about Decker Cave. The plan details the history of vandalism and pothunting at the site, including the disturbance of American Indian burials. It also explores the potential for further archeological exploration of the cave in coordination with concerned American Indian groups and provides a plan to deter additional looting of the site. Supplemental materials include a discussion with the University of Missouri Archeological Department, a review of literature, and maps of the area.

  • Letter from Suzan Shown Harjo to Thomas King, August 12, 1985 by Suzan Shown Harjo

    Letter from Suzan Shown Harjo to Thomas King, August 12, 1985

    Suzan Shown Harjo

    This typed letter from Suzan Shown Harjo, Executive Director of the National Congress of American Indians, was sent to Dr. Thomas King, Director of Resource Preservation for the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, on August 12, 1985. Harjo praises the new draft Guidelines for the Consideration of Traditional Cultural Values in Historic Preservation Review because they promote active consultation with American Indians before grave sites are disturbed and favor reburial of remains over perceived scientific value. She contrasts the draft Guidelines with those of the U.S. Department of the Interior, which heavily favor the self-interests of archeologists and anthropologists.

  • Draft Guidelines for Consideration of Traditional Cultural Values in Historic Preservation Review by Advisory Council on Historic Preservation

    Draft Guidelines for Consideration of Traditional Cultural Values in Historic Preservation Review

    Advisory Council on Historic Preservation

    This 21-page typed document is a draft of Guidelines for the Consideration of Traditional Cultural Values in Historic Preservation Review, dated August 1, 1985. The document outlines the Historic Preservation Advisory Council's policies and procedures concerning project planning for historic properties, taking into account the traditional cultural values that may be impacted by such projects. It provides background on the American Indian Religious Freedom Act and contains an appendix dealing with the treatment of human remains.

  • Statement of the Director, American Indians Against Desecration, July 30, 1985 by Jan Hammil

    Statement of the Director, American Indians Against Desecration, July 30, 1985

    Jan Hammil

    This 4-page typed document is a statement from the Director of American Indians Against Desecration, Jan Hammil, speaking before the United States House of Representatives on July 30, 1985. Hammil provides a history of the AID organization as a result of the Longest Walk, when the bodies of ancestors were discovered in museums and universities across the United States. Hammil expresses the need for a federal policy to avoid significant archaeological sites that incorporate Indian burial sites. She also advocates for the consideration of traditional cultural values when organizing archaeological digs, referencing the American Indian Freedom of Religion Act and the U.S. Constitution. She criticizes the outdated policies of the Office of Surface Mining and the Department of the Interior.

  • Indiana University vs. Indian People: Defending Our Roots in the Land by Jan Hammil

    Indiana University vs. Indian People: Defending Our Roots in the Land

    Jan Hammil

    This 4-page typed press release titled "Defending our Roots in the Land" was issued by American Indians Against Desecration circa November 1983. It describes the history of the founding of AID as a result of the Longest Walk, when Indians discovered the remains of their ancestors housed in universities, laboratories and museums across the United States. It also details the conflict between the Glenn Black Laboratory of Archeology at Indiana University and members of AID who were denied access to human remains stored there. A prayer vigil and four days of fasting are planned in protest.

  • Notes on Federal and State Laws Pertaining to Grave Desecration and Excavation of Remains by Unknown

    Notes on Federal and State Laws Pertaining to Grave Desecration and Excavation of Remains

    Unknown

    These sixteen pages of typed notes were compiled circa 1979. They document federal and state laws and definitions pertaining to cemeteries, disinterment, removal of remains and archeological excavation. Also noted are laws dealing with historic preservation, American Indian religious freedom and right to privacy.

  • Resolution of the Navajo Tribal Council: Administration and Maintenance of Cemeteries and Burial in Navajo Cemeteries, February 12, 1958 by Paul Jones

    Resolution of the Navajo Tribal Council: Administration and Maintenance of Cemeteries and Burial in Navajo Cemeteries, February 12, 1958

    Paul Jones

    This three-page typed document is a resolution of the Navajo Tribal Council on Administration and Maintenance of Cemeteries and Burial in Navajo Cemeteries approved on February 12, 1958. It addresses issues such as overcrowding and who is allowed to be buried within Navajo cemeteries. An advisory committee was created to designate sites for cemeteries and provide for their beautification and safeguarding.

 
  • 1
  • 2
 
 

Browse

  • Collections
  • Disciplines
  • Authors

Search

Advanced Search

  • Notify me via email or RSS

Author Corner

  • Author FAQ

Links

  • Ursinus College Welcome Home Project
Ursinus bear logo
 
Elsevier - Digital Commons
 

Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement | Privacy | Copyright

Ursinus College